GHRP-2 Research & Studies

To explore the potential of growth hormone-releasing peptide 2 (GHRP-2) for tendon-bone healing in a rat rotator cuff tear (RCT) model.

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of growth hormone-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2) and cysteamine (CS) administration on growth performance in yaks with growth retardation and try to elucidate its regulatory mechanisms. Trial 1, thirty-six 1-year-old Qinghai high plateau yaks (body weight 38-83.2 kg) were randomly chosen for body weight and jugular blood samples collection. The relationship between body weight and serum GHRH (P < 0.05, R = 0.45), GH (P < 0.05, R = 0.47), IGF-1 (P < 0.05, R = 0.62) was significantly correlated in yaks colonies with lighter body weights. Trial 2, fifteen 1-year-old Qinghai high plateau yaks with growth retardation (average body weight 54.8 ± 8.24 kg) were randomly selected and assigned to negative control group (NG), GHRP-2 injection group (GG) and cysteamine feeding group (CG), with 5 yaks per group. Another five 1-year-old Qinghai high plateau yaks with normal growth performance (average body weight 75.3 ± 2.43 kg) were selected as positive control group (PG). The average daily gain (ADG) of the GG and CG were significantly higher than those in the PG and NG (P < 0.05). Both GHRP-2 and CS administration significantly enhanced the myofiber diameter and area of skeletal muscle (P<0.05). GHRP-2 significantly enhanced the serum GH and IGF-1 levels (P < 0.05), and up-regulated GHR, IGF-1 and IGF-1R mRNA expression in the liver and skeletal muscle (P < 0.05), enhanced the mRNA expression of PI3K, AKt and mTOR in the skeletal muscle (P<0.05). CS significantly reduced the serum SS levels and the hypothalamus SS mRNA expression (P < 0.05), and enhanced GHR and IGF-1 mRNA expression in the liver (P < 0.05), decreased the mRNA expression of muscle atrophy F-box (Atrogin-1) and muscle ring finger 1 (MuRF1) mRNA (P < 0.05).

The purpose of this study was to investigate an efficient synthetic route to the mono-PEGylated growth hormone releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2) and its biological activity in vivo. The commercially available key PEGylating reagent, mPEG-NHS ester, was successfully utilized to the synthesis of mono-PEGylated GHRP-2, during which the PEGylation profiles of GHRP-2 were monitored by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The product was purified by cation exchange chromatography, and its biological activity was conducted in rats. The desired mono-PEGylated GHRP-2 as the major product was readily obtained in anhydrous aprotic solvent, such as dimethyl formamide (DMF) and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), when the molar ratio of mPEG-NHS ester to GHRP-2 was fixed to be 0.8:1. The products were characterized by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry. The evaluation of the biological activity for the products showed that the mono-PEGylated GHRP-2 gave a more stable activity than GHRP-2, suggesting that PEGylation led to the increase in the half-life of GHRP-2 in plasma without greatly impairing the biological activity. PEGylation of the GHRP-2 is a good choice for the development of the GHRP-2 applications.

The arginine + GHRH test has been established as an alternative to the insulin tolerance test (ITT) for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency (AGHD). However, the glucagon, arginine, and GH releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2) test are recommended as alternatives in Japan. The objective of this study was to evaluate the arginine and GHRP-2 tests as alternatives to the ITT for the diagnosis of AGHD in a Japanese population. Three stimulation tests (ITT, arginine test, and GHRP-2 test) were conducted in 71 pre-operative adult patients with pituitary tumors (age, 18-65 years). The peak GH responses to each test were examined. The peak GH responses were significantly lower with the ARG test (median 4.43 μg/L) (p < 0.0001) than with the ITT (median 9.38 μg/L), and the peak GH responses with the GHRP-2 test (median 28.88 μg/L) were higher (p < 0.0001). However, among the AGHD patients, there was no significant difference between the peak GH responses to the ARG test and the ITT. The sensitivities and specificities of the ARG / GHRP-2 tests compared to the ITT for the diagnosis of severe AGHD (peak GH responses to ITT ≤ 1.8 μg/L) were 93.8% / 81.3% and 85.5% / 94.5%, respectively. The arginine and GHRP-2 stimulation tests are acceptable alternatives to the ITT for the diagnosis of AGHD in Japanese patients. The method and criterion for the diagnosis of AGHD should be reconsidered and adjusted to each population.

Black market products of a pharmaceutical nature and nutritional supplements have received substantial and increasing attention because of potential performance enhancement in elite and non-professional sports. In addition, improved general health is claimed for non-competing individuals. The risks and foreseeable dangers of the uncontrolled use of highly potent and non-approved pharmaceutical compounds in healthy individuals are of considerable concern. In the present case report, the emerging drug candidate GHRP-2 with verified growth-hormone-releasing properties was identified and quantified in tablets offered as an over-the-counter nutritional supplement. The impact of this orally active peptide on the hGH/IGF-axis has been established for several years and its illicit use in elite sports has been assumed. As a releasing factor for hGH, GHRP-2 belongs to the list of substances prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). Unfortunately, to date there is no routinely performed assay for the determination of these peptides potentially occurring in biological fluids of competing athletes, but the present data will facilitate the implementation by providing principle analytical information on liquid chromatographic and mass spectrometric behaviour. Qualitative identification of the target analyte after extraction from the tablet matrix was performed by high resolution/high accuracy mass spectrometry after liquid chromatographic separation under consideration of the accurate masses and the ratios of the protonated molecules and their fragment ions derived from their collisionally induced dissociation. Quantitative results were obtained by means of liquid chromatography coupled to a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer and linear regression using an external calibration curve (with GHRP-2 reference compound) adjusted via internal standard (Hexarelin). Hereby, the content of GHRP-2 was determined with approximately 50 µg per tablet.

Growth hormone (GH)-releasing peptides (GHRPs) are synthetic peptides which induce strong GH release in both animals and humans. Among them, GHRP-2 is known to stimulate GH release by acting at both hypothalamic and pituitary sites, but also induces adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) release in healthy subjects. GHRP-2 may stimulate ACTH release directly via GHRP receptor type 1a in ACTH-producing tumors. GHRP-2 increases ACTH secretion in rat in vivo, but not ACTH release from rat primary pituitary cells. In the present study, in order to elucidate the mechanism underlying ACTH secretion by GHRPs, mouse pituitary cells were stimulated by GHRP-2. GHRP receptor mRNA was expressed in the mouse pituitary, and GHRP-2 directly stimulated secretion and synthesis of ACTH in the mouse anterior pituitary cells. GHRP-2 increased intracellular cyclic AMP production. H89, a potent protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor, and bisindolylmaleimide I, a selective protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor, inhibited the GHRP-2-induced ACTH release, and that H89, but not bisindolylmaleimide I, inhibited the GHRP-2-induced proopiomelanocortin mRNA levels. Together, the GHRP-2-induced ACTH release was regulated via both PKA and PKC pathways in the mouse pituitary cells, while ACTH was synthesized by GHRP-2 only via the PKA pathway.

Somatostatin (SS), GHRH, GH-releasing peptide (GHRP), and the sex-steroid milieu regulate GH secretion.

Thermal injury results in hypermetabolism, loss of body weight, and skeletal muscle wasting in mice and rats. Our earlier studies have demonstrated that ghrelin injection stimulates food intake and growth hormone release and inhibits skeletal muscle proteolysis in rats with thermal injury. We sought to develop a lower molecular weight, stable and longer acting peptide to combat the catabolic responses caused by thermal injury. Towards this goal, we examined the role of the hexapeptide mimetic of ghrelin, growth hormone-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2), on expression of E3 ubiquitin ligases and breakdown of muscle protein in rats with thermal injury. Slow in vivo release of GHRP-2 through minipump for 24h attenuated the thermal injury-induced increase in mRNA expression of IL-6 and of the E3 ubiquitin ligases, MuRF-1 and MAFbx, in rat skeletal muscle. Furthermore, burn-induced increases in total and myofibrillar protein breakdown from rat EDL muscle were attenuated by GHRP-2. These findings suggest that catabolic responses resulting from thermal injury can be attenuated by GHRP-2.

Chronic arthritis induces hypermetabolism and cachexia. Ghrelin is a gastrointestinal hormone that has been proposed as a treatment to prevent cachexia. The aim of this work was to examine the effect of administration of the ghrelin agonist growth hormone-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2) to arthritic rats. Male Wistar rats were injected with Freund's adjuvant, and 15 days later arthritic and control rats were daily injected with GHRP-2 (100 microg/kg) or with saline for 8 days. Arthritis induced an increase in serum ghrelin (P < 0.01) and a decrease in serum concentrations of leptin (P < 0.01), whereas GHRP-2 administration increased serum concentrations of leptin. GHRP-2 increased food intake in control rats but not in arthritic rats. However, in arthritic rats GHRP-2 administration ameliorated the external symptoms of arthritis, as it decreased the arthritis score (10.4 +/- 0.8 vs. 13.42 +/- 0.47, P < 0.01) and the paw volume. In addition, circulating IL-6 and nitrites/nitrates were increased by arthritis, and GHRP-2 treatment decreased the serum IL-6 levels (P < 0.01). To elucidate whether GHRP-2 is able to modulate IL-6 release directly on immune cells, peritoneal macrophage cultures were incubated with GHRP-2 or ghrelin, the endogenous ligand of the growth hormone (GH) secretagogue receptor. Both GHRP-2 (10(-7) M) and ghrelin (10(-7) M) prevented endotoxin-induced IL-6 and decreased nitrite/nitrate release from peritoneal macrophages in vitro. These data suggest that GHRP-2 administration has an anti-inflammatory effect in arthritic rats that seems to be mediated by ghrelin receptors directly on immune cells.

GHRP-2 is a synthetic agonist of ghrelin, the newly-discovered gut peptide which binds to the growth hormone (GH) secretagogue receptor. Ghrelin has two major effects, stimulating both GH secretion and appetite/meal initiation. GHRP-2 has been extensively studied for its utility as a growth hormone secretagogue (GHS). Animal studies have shown its effect on food intake. However, whether GHRP-2 can also stimulate appetite in humans when administered acutely is not known. We subcutaneously infused 7 lean, healthy males with GHRP-2 (1 microg/kg/h) or saline for 270 minutes and then measured their intake of an ad libitum, buffet-style meal. Similar to what has been reported for ghrelin administration, our subjects ate 35.9 +/- 10.9% more when infused with GHRP-2 vs. saline, with every subject increasing their intake even when calculated per kg body weight (136.0 +/- 13.0 kJ/kg [32.5 +/- 3.1 kcal/kg] vs. 101.3 +/- 10.5 kJ/kg [24.2 +/- 2.5 kcal/kg], p = 0.008). The macronutrient composition of consumed food was not different between conditions. As expected, serum GH levels rose significantly during GHRP-2 infusion (AUC 5550 +/- 1090 microg/L/240 min vs. 412 +/- 161 microg/L/240 min, p = 0.003). These data are the first to demonstrate that GHRP-2, like ghrelin, increases food intake, suggesting that GHRP-2 is a valuable tool for investigating ghrelin effects on eating behavior in humans.

Pralmorelin [GPA 748, GHRP 2, growth hormone-releasing peptide 2, KP-102 D, KP 102 LN] is an orally active, synthetic growth hormone-releasing peptide from a series of compounds that were developed by Polygen in Germany and Tulane University in the US. Researchers at Tulane University led by Dr Cyril Bowers synthesised a series of small highly active peptides ranging in size from 3-5 amino acids or partial peptides that were suitable for a variety of administration formats (subcutaneous, buccal, oral, depot). These peptides mimic the actions of ghrelin, a 28 amino acid octanoyl peptide that regulates the release of growth hormone (GH), and may play an important role in bone and muscle growth, food intake and possibly improve recovery from injury. The use of pralmorelin as a diagnostic agent for GH deficiency is based on its ability to markedly increase plasma levels of GH in healthy subjects irrespectively of gender, obesity or age. However, in patients with GH deficiency, the effect of pralmorelin on GH levels is significantly lower compared with healthy controls. Analysis of the receiver-operating characteristics curve provided the cut-off threshold value for the GH peak of 15.0 micro g/L for the identification of patients with GH deficiency from those of healthy controls. Kaken acquired worldwide manufacturing and marketing rights to pralmorelin, and then sublicensed it to Wyeth (formerly American Home Products) for the US and Canada. Kaken retains rights to pralmorelin in Japan. On 11 March 2002 American Home Products changed its name and the names of its subsidiaries Wyeth-Ayerst and Wyeth Lederle to Wyeth. Kaken also granted exclusive sublicense options in Africa, Australia, Europe, Latin America and New Zealand to unspecified partners. Pralmorelin as KP-102 D [KP-102D] is currently awaiting approval in Japan as a diagnostic agent for hypothalamo-pituitary function. It is planned to be launched in Japan for this indication in 2004. Pralmorelin is also undergoing phase II clinical trials with Kaken in Japan for short stature (pituitary dwarfism) as KP-102 LN [KP-102LN]. Its launch for the treatment of short stature is planned for 2009 (Kaken, Annual Report 2003). The agent was undergoing phase II trials in the US for the treatment of GH deficiency with Wyeth; however, it appears that its development was discontinued. Tulane University was granted a US Patent (6,468,974 issued in October 2002), as well as patent protection in Europe and other countries for a series of synthesised GH-releasing peptides.

Central hyposomatotrophism, hypothyroidism and hypogonadism are present concomitantly in men with prolonged critical illness. This study evaluated the impact of combined treatment with GH-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2), TRH and GnRH for 5 days compared with GHRP-2 + TRH and with GHRP-2 alone.

Administration of GH-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2) represents a potential mode of therapy for children of short stature with inadequate secretion of GH. Requisite information to determine the dosing route and frequency for GHRP-2 consists of the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) for this compound, neither of which have been previously evaluated in children. The purpose of this study was to characterize the PK and PD of GHRP-2 in children with short stature. Ten prepubertal children (nine boys and one girl; 7.7 +/- 2.4 yr old) received a single 1 microg/kg i.v. dose of GHRP-2 over 1 min, followed by repeated (n = 9) blood sampling over 2 h. GHRP-2 and GH were quantitated by specific RIA methods. PK parameters were calculated from curve fitting of GHRP-2 and GH vs. time data. Posttreatment plasma GH concentrations (normalized for pretreatment values) were used as the effect measurement. PD parameters were generated using the sigmoid Emax model. Disposition of GHRP-2 best fit a biexponential function. GHRP-2 PK parameters (mean +/- SD) were: alpha = 13.4 +/- 9.7 h(-1), beta = 1.3 +/- 0.3 h(-1), t(1/2beta) = 0.55 +/- 0.14 h, AUC(0-infinity) = 2.02 +/- 1.37 ng/mL x h, Cmax = 7.4 +/- 3.8 ng/mL, plasma clearance = 0.66 +/- 0.32 L/h x kg, and apparent volume of distribution = 0.32 +/- 0.14 L/kg. PK parameters for GH were: appearance rate constant = 5.9 +/- 3.1 h(-1), elimination t(1/2) = 0.37 +/- 0.15 h, lag time = 0.05 +/- 0.01 h, Cmax = 50.7 +/- 17.2 ng/mL, Tmax = 0.42 +/- 0.16 h, and AUC(0-infinity) = 47.9 +/- 26.1 ng/mL x h. PD parameters for GHRP-2 were: Ke0 = 1.13 +/- 0.94 h(-1), gamma = 13.15 +/- 9.44, E0 = 6.63 +/- 4.86 ng/mL (GH), Emax = 67.5 +/- 23.5 ng/mL (GH), and EC50 = 1.09 +/- 0.59 ng/mL. We concluded that 1) GHRP-2 produced a predictable and significant (i.e. compared to pretreatment values) increase in plasma GH concentrations; 2) the PK-PD link model enabled quantitative assessment of GHRP-2 modulation of serum GH levels; and 3) definition of the EC50 for GHRP-2 will enable PD and PK evaluations of extravascular dosing regimens for children.

Effect of growth hormone-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2) on ovine somatotrophs is abolished by a growth hormone-releasing factor (GRF) receptor antagonist, which raises the possibility that GHRP-2 may act on GRF receptors. In the present study, we used rat pituitary GC cells with or without stable transfection of cDNA coding for the human GRF receptor (GC/R+ or GC/R-) to determine whether or not GHRP-2 acts via the GRF receptor. Northern blot analysis indicated that GRF receptor mRNA was undetectable in GC/R-cells, whereas a high level of expression occurred in GC/R+ cells that were transfected by GRF receptor cDNA. In GC/R- cells, incubation with up to 10(-7)M of either hGRF or GHRP-2 did not alter the intracellular cAMP, [Ca2+]i, or GH secretion. In GC/R+ cells, hGRF (10(-11)-10(-7)M) increased cAMP levels in a concentration-dependent manner up to 20-fold. This increase in cAMP levels was blocked by a GRF receptor antagonist, [Ac-Tyr1, D-Arg2]-GRF 1-29, but not by a Ca2+ channel blocker, NiCl2 (0.5 mM). GH secretion and [Ca2+]i were, however, not increased by hGRF. Incubation of the transfected cells with 10(-1)-10(-8)MGH RP-2 did not modify intracellular cAMP levels. This result suggests that GHRP-2 does not act through the GRF receptor.

Growth hormone-releasing peptides (GHRPs) are synthetic, non-natural peptides endowed with potent stimulatory effects on somatotrope secretion in animals and humans. They have no structural homology with GHRH and act via specific receptors present either at the pituitary or the hypothalamic level both in animals and in humans. The GHRP receptor has recently been cloned and, interestingly, it does not show sequence homology with other G-protein-coupled receptors known so far. This evidence strongly suggests the existence of a natural GHRP-like ligand which, however, has not yet been found. The mechanisms underlying the GHRP effect are still unclear. At present, several data favor the hypothesis that GHRPs could act by counteracting somatostatinergic activity both at the pituitary and the hypothalamic level and/or, at least partially, via a GHRH-mediated mechanism. However, the possibility that GHRPs act via an unknown hypothalamic factor (U factor) is still open. GHRP-6 was the first hexapeptide to be extensively studied in humans. More recently, a heptapeptide, GHRP-1, and two other hexapeptides, GHRP-2 and Hexarelin, have been synthesized and are now available for human studies. Moreover, non-peptidyl GHRP mimetics have been developed which act via GHRP receptors and their effects have been clearly demonstrated in animals and in humans in vivo. Among non-peptidyl GHRPs, MK-0677 seems the most interesting molecule. The GH-releasing activity of GHRPs is marked and dose-related after intravenous, subcutaneous, intranasal and even oral administration. The effect of GHRPs is reproducible and undergoes partial desensitization, more during continuous infusion, less during intermittent administration: in fact, prolonged administration of GHRPs increases IGF-1 levels both in animals and in humans. The GH-releasing effect of GHRPs does not depend on sex but undergoes age-related variations. It increases from birth to puberty, persists at a similar level in adulthood and decreases thereafter. By the sixth decade of life, the activity of GHRPs is reduced but it is still marked and higher than that of GHRH. The GH-releasing activity of GHRPs is synergistic with that of GHRH, is not affected by opioid receptor antagonists, such as naloxone, and is only blunted by inhibitory influences, including neurotransmitters, glucose, free fatty acids, gluco corticoids, recombinant human GH and even exogenous somatostatin, which are known to almost abolish the effect of GHRH. GHRPs maintain their GH-releasing effect in somatotrope hypersecretory states such as in acromegaly, anorexia nervosa and hyperthyroidism. On the other hand, their good GH-releasing activity has been shown in some but not in other somatotrope hyposecretory states. In fact, reduced GH responses after GHRP administration have been reported in idiopathic GH deficiency as well as in idiopathic short stature, in obesity and in hypothyroidism, while in patients with pituitary stalk disconnection or Cushing's syndrome the somatotrope responsiveness to GHRPs is almost absent. In short children an increase in height velocity has also been reported during chronic GHRP treatment. Thus, based on their marked GH-releasing effect even after oral administration, GHRPs offer their own clinical usefulness for treatment of some GH hyposecretory states.

Studies with chronic GHRP-2 or GHRH administration were performed to demonstrate and better understand the interrelationships between GHRP-2, GHRH and SRIF. Normal younger and older men and women received chronic GHRP-2, GHRH or GHRP-2 + GHRH for 7-30 days. It was demonstrated that chronic administration of either GHRP-2 or GHRH could convert an additive GHRP-2 + GHRH GH response to a synergistic one. In addition, the type of synergistic response induced by chronic GHRP-2 versus GHRH was different. Whether the GH response becomes desensitized during chronic administration depends in part on the dosage and frequency of administration. The potential to learn more about the in vivo actions of GHRP relative to the regulation of GH secretion is underscored by studying the GH responses to GHRP-2, GHRH and GHRP-2 + GHRH.

The mechanism of action of GH-releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6) and GHRP-2 on GH release was investigated in ovine and rat pituitary cells in vitro. In partially purified sheep somatotrophs, GHRP-2 and GH-releasing factor (GRF) increased intracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP) concentrations and caused GH release in a dose-dependent manner; GHRP-6 did not increase cAMP levels. An additive effect of maximal doses of GRF and GHRP-2 was observed in both cAMP and GH levels whereas combined GHRP-6 and GHRP-2 at maximal doses produced an additive effect on GH release only. Pretreatment of the cells with MDL 12,330A, an adenylyl cyclase inhibitor, prevented cAMP accumulation and the subsequent release of GH that was caused by either GHRP-2 or GRF. The cAMP antagonist, Rp-cAMP also blocked GH release in response to GHRP-2 and GRF. The cAMP antagonist did not prevent the effect of GHRP-6 on GH secretion whereas MDL 12,330A partially reduced the effect. An antagonist for the GRF receptor, [Ac-Tyr1,D-Arg2]-GRF 1-29, significantly diminished the effect of GHRP-2 and GRF on cAMP accumulation and GH release, but did not affect GH release induced by GHRP-6. Somatostatin prevented cAMP accumulation and GH release responses to GHRP-2, GRF and GHRP-6. Ca2+ channel blockade did not affect the cAMP increase in response to GHRP-2 or GRF but totally prevented GH release in response to GHRP-2, GRF and GHRP-6. These results indicated that GHRP-2 acts on ovine pituitary somatotrophs to increase cAMP concentration in a manner similar to that of GRF; this occurs even during the blockade of Ca2+ influx. GHRP-6 caused GH release without an increase in intracellular cAMP levels. GH release in response to all three secretagogues was reduced by somatostatin and was dependent upon the influx of extracellular Ca2+. The additive effect of GHRP-2 and GRF or GHRP-6 suggested that the three peptides may act on different receptors. In rat pituitary cell cultures, GHRP-6 had no effect on cAMP levels, but potentiated the effect of GRF on cAMP accumulation. The synergistic effect of GRF and GHRP-6 on cAMP accumulation did not occur in sheep somatotrophs. Whereas GHRP-2 caused cAMP accumulation in sheep somatotrophs, it did not do so in rat pituitary cells. These data indicate species differences in the response of pituitary somatotrophs to the GHRPs and this is probably due to different subtypes of GHRP receptor in rat or sheep.